检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:沙胜义 冯庆善[2] 王学力 燕冰川[2] 贾光明[2] 任重[2] 费雪松[2]
机构地区:[1]中国石油管道公司大庆(加格达奇)输油气分公司,黑龙江加格达奇165000 [2]中国石油管道公司,河北廊坊065000
出 处:《油气储运》2014年第8期834-838,共5页Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation
摘 要:埋地管道凹坑缺陷开挖验证时,发现内检测结果与现场开挖验证结果间存在较大差异,因而为内检测数据的评估及修复判定带来困难。研究发现,这是由于缺少统一、规范的开挖验证程序和有效的测量方法造成的。结合目前国内外凹坑现场开挖验证方法及现场实践经验,提出了一套凹坑缺陷开挖验证程序,并根据现场实际进行开挖验证,结果表明该凹坑缺陷开挖验证程序具有可行性。着重对不同凹坑测量方法的结果进行了比较,结果表明三维激光扫描法能够得到准确的凹坑深度值和整体轮廓,并可基于输出结果直接进行应变分析等进一步的评估工作。(图6,参6)As to pit defects of a buried pipeline, it is found that there is a big difference between the inner inspection result and the excavated verification result, which makes it difficult to assess the data from inner inspection and determine the necessity of repair. Investigation revealed that this is due to the lack of a unified and standard excavated verification procedure and effective measuring method. Combining the existing excavated verification methods and field practices in China and abroad, a set of excavated verification procedure is proposed in this paper, and it is applied under practical conditions. The results show that the excavated verification procedure is feasible. Moreover, the results of different pit measurement methods are especially compared, indicating that accurate pit depth value and overall outline can be obtained using 3D laser scanning method, and further evaluation like strain analysis can be carried out based on the output result. (6 Figures, 6 References)
分 类 号:TE832[石油与天然气工程—油气储运工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222