慢性疼痛患者整体疼痛评估量表的汉化及信效度评价  

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Global Pain Scale

作　　者：周玲[1] 孔红武[2] 王薇[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学医学院附属第一医院护理教育中心,杭州市310003 [2]杭州市中医院外一科

出　　处：《中华护理杂志》2014年第9期1121-1124,共4页Chinese Journal of Nursing

摘　　要：目的引进和翻译整体疼痛评估量表（Global Pain Scale，GPS），并对其进行效度和信度评价，探索其在国内的适用性。方法首先将整体疼痛评估量表进行翻译、回译及文化调适，确定中文版GPS量表，对230例慢性疼痛患者进行自我疼痛评估，测量其效度和信度。结果中文版GPS量表内容效度良好，内容效度指数为0．67～1．00，全体一致性量表水平的内容效度指数（S．CVI／UA）为0．5，平均量量水平的内容效度指数（S-CVI／Ave）为0．90；结构效度较好．因子分析共提取3个公因子，能解释总方差的71．447％，且各项目在相应因子上有较满意的因子载荷量（〉0．4）；具有良好的内部一致性，Cronbach’s α系数为0．950。结论中文版GPS量表简明易懂，使用方便，测量结果显示具有良好的信效度．可以作为我国慢性疼痛患者疼痛自评的测量工具。Objective To translate the Global Pain Scale（GPS） into Chinese and evaluate its reliability and validity. Methods The Chinese version of GPS was translated from the original,back-translated and adjusted for cultural adaptation. The reliability and validity were tested in 230 patients with chronic pain. Results The content validity index（CVI） was 0.67 to 1.00,which indicated a desirable content validity. Three factors were extracted with cumu- lative contribution rate of 71.447%,which demonstrated a good constructive validity. The loading of each item on the corresponding factors was higher than 0.4. The Cronbach＇s α coefficient was 0.950. Conclusion The Chinese version of GPS has been proved to be valid and reliable. It is a valuable tool for evaluating the level of pain in patients with chronic pain.

关 键 词：疼痛 整体疼痛评估量表 信度 效度 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]