检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长安大学特殊地区公路工程教育部重点实验室,陕西西安710064
出 处:《同济大学学报(自然科学版)》2014年第9期1352-1358,1458,共8页Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science
基 金:西部交通建设科技项目(2009318000102);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(CHD2011ZD021)
摘 要:采用主成分分析与专家调查相结合的方法进行因子辨识,筛选出对公路沿线区域地震风险有显著影响的峰值加速度、植被覆盖率、地层岩性和地表坡度作为评价因子.引入云模型理论,改进传统层次分析法的不足,提出了基于云模型-层次分析法的地震区公路震害评估赋权方法.运用地理信息系统技术平台,研究了各风险因子的标度分值,建立了地震区公路震害风险评估模型并进行了实例分析.结果表明:实例工程震害风险指数在1.00~6.96之间,其中大部分区域震害风险指数处于5以下,路线起点南及东南为高峰值加速度、硬岩、大边坡坡度区域,震害风险指数接近7,风险评估计算结果与实际相符.The risk factors were discriminated according to its influence on seismic risk of highway based on the principal component analysis and expert surveys. Four factors such as the peak acceleration, vegetation coverage, formation lithology, slope, were selected as evaluation factors for their significant effect. Traditional analytic hierarchy process was improved by resorting to the cloud model, and a weight approach was proposed for seismic risk assessment based on cloud model- analytic hierarchy process. The scale scores of each risk factor was studied by using geographic information systems technology platform. The assessment model of seismic risk was set up, and the method was validated. The results indicate that the seismic risk index of the experiment area is 1.00-6.96. Seismic risk value of most regional is less than 5.00, the maximum value in the south and the southeastof the starting point with high peak acceleration, hard rock and large slop is close to 7. Risk assessment results agree well with the measured data.
关 键 词:道路工程 地震 风险评估 云模型 主成分分析法 层次分析法
分 类 号:U412.13[交通运输工程—道路与铁道工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31