检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹富乐
出 处:《湛江师范学院学报》2014年第4期56-59,共4页Journal of Zhanjiang Normal College
摘 要:犯罪实行行为着手的认定关系到罪与非罪以及量刑轻重的问题。关于着手的认定标准,学界存在主观说、客观说、折中说等观点,众说纷纭却又弊端重重。事实上,犯罪实行行为着手是一个实践性问题,并不存在统一的标准。对于犯罪实行行为着手的认定,应当结合具体的个案,由法官自由裁量进行判断。理论则可以确立着手认定的基本原则和影响着手判断的诸多考量因素,以此为个案的自由裁量提供依据和准则。Commencement of crime enforcement concerns the identification of guilty or innocence as well as sentence degree.There exists,in academic circles,various doctrines stating the identification standard of this issue,such as subj ectivism,obj ectivism and eclecticism,which have the defects of their qualities.Rather than insisting on an unified standard,commencement of crime enforcement should be viewed as a practical issue,the judgement of which varies with individual cases.Judges have discretionary power in deciding whether certain crime enforcement starts or not.Thus,theory plays the role in explai-ning fundamental principles and consideration factors in identificating commencement of crime enforcement so as to provide guidence in discretion of specific cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.210.133