检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江医学高等专科学校,杭州310053 [2]徐州医学院第二附属医院
出 处:《中国实用护理杂志》2014年第22期58-60,共3页Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
摘 要:目的系统评价我国婴幼儿经头皮动脉采集血气分析标本方法的效果。方法采用Meta分析方法,对国内婴幼儿经头皮动脉采集血气分析标本的文献进行分析。结果共纳入11个研究,干预组一次穿刺成功率为87.5%,98.0%;对照组一次穿刺成功率为55.3%~94.6%。Meta分析结果显示,婴幼儿经头皮动脉采集血气分析标本的一次穿刺成功率较高。结论婴幼儿经头皮动脉采集血气标本的效果优于其他部位,一次穿刺成功率高,局部不良反应发生率低。Objective To give a systematic reviews on effect of taking blood gas via cephalic artery for infants. Methods Meta-analysis were used to analyze literatures about taking blood gas via cephalic artery for infants. Results 11 studies were included. The rate of successful puncture was 87.5%~98.0% in the intervention group and 55,3%-94.6% in the control group. The rate of successful puncture via cephalic artery were higher. Conclusions Effect of taking blood gas via cephalic artery for infant was better than that via other artery. Successful rate was high, while the incidence rate of local side effects was low.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171