检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孟元[1] 张胜容[1] 刘宝利[1] 李靖[2] 赵轶雯[3] 王雨[1] 赵静[1] 赵文景[1] 葛楠[1] 杨彦芳[4] 刘洋[5] 任建伟[6] 程虹[7] 刘建平[8]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京中医医院,北京市100010 [2]北京中医药大学东直门医院,北京市100700 [3]首都医科大学附属天坛医院,北京市100050 [4]中日友好医院,北京市100029 [5]解放军总医院,北京市100853 [6]航空总医院,北京市100012 [7]首都医科大学附属安贞医院,北京市100029 [8]北京中医药大学循证医学中心,北京市100029
出 处:《实用医学杂志》2014年第16期2658-2662,共5页The Journal of Practical Medicine
基 金:首都医学科技发展基金资助课题(编号:SF-2009-I-06)
摘 要:目的:研究中成药辨证论治对CKD3-4期患者的临床疗效。方法:采用前瞻性多中心随机对照研究的方法,将符合方案的339例患者,分为规范组167例、对照组172例,规范组按辨证论治方案予中成药单方或组方口服;对照组予经验中成药单方口服;观察24周后两组的临床疗效。结果:CKD3期规范组治疗后血肌酐、肾小球滤过率估算值、24 h尿蛋白定量均有统计学意义(P<0.05);对照组无明显变化(P>0.05),规范组优于对照组;CKD4期规范组与治疗组,组内、组间比较均无统计学差异(P>0.05)。CKD3-4期规范组治疗后的中医证候积分均较基线时明显改善(P<0.05),而对照组无统计学意义(P>0.05),规范组较对照组中医证候积分下降更明显(P<0.05)。结论:中成药辨证论治对CKD3-4期患者在保护肾功能、减少尿蛋白、降低证候积分方面优于经验用药治疗。Objective To study the clinical curative effect of syndrome differentiation-based treatment with traditional Chinese medicine on patient with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD3-4). Method According to prospective multicenter randomized controlled study which was applied to the patients with CKD3-4 , the total of 339 patients were divided into two groups. To one group as standard including 167 patients ,the other including 172 patients. Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine single or combined-prescription oral treatment according to syndrome differentiation-based treatment was employed. To the other group as reference , Chinese Traditional Patent Medicine oral treatment according to experienced rule was applied. The clinical curative effect results were obtained after a 24 weeks-treatment. Result The Scr ,eGFR and UTP with CKD3 in standard group illustrate statistics significance (P〈0.05). On the opposite, those of the reference group remain insignificance (P 〉 0.05). The clinical curative effect result of patient in standard group was better than that of reference group. About the clinical curative effect of CKD4, no statistics significance difference (P 〉 0.05) could be found between groups or between patients in one group. The TCM score of patient with CKD3-4 in standard group have improved (P 〈 0.05) according to baseline. However, that of reference group did not show any statistics significance (P 〉 0.05). Conclusion Syndrome differentiation-based treatment with traditional Chinese medicine illustrated a better result in protection of renal function, reduction in urinary protein and decline in TCM score than the treatment according to experienced rule.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15