检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《空军医学杂志》2014年第2期80-82,共3页Medical Journal of Air Force
摘 要:目的观察火针配合毫针治疗部队膝关节软组织训练伤的临床疗效。方法将空军某部官兵军事训练中所致膝关节软组织损伤126例按就诊顺序随机分为两组,治疗组64例采用火针配合毫针治疗,对照组62例采用常规理疗,观察两组的临床疗效。结果治疗组治愈率为75.0%,愈显率为92.2%;对照组治愈率为48.4%,愈显率69.4%。两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论火针配合毫针治疗军事训练所致的膝关节软组织损伤的疗效优于常规理疗。Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of fire-needle therapy combined with filiform-needle therapy for treatment on military training injuries of knee joint's soft tissues. Methods One hundred and twenty-six cases of such disease were divided into two groups by random number table. 64 cases of the treatment group were treated by fire-needle therapy combined with filiform-needle therapy, and 62 cases of the control group were treated by only routine treatment. Evaluate the clinical efficacy of two groups. Results The respective rate of total effectively cured and good improvement were 75.0% and 92.2% in treatment group, while 48.4% and 69.4% in control group. There were statistically significant difference between the two groups(P0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effect of fire-needle therapy combined with filiform-needle therapy for treatment on military training injuries of knee joint's soft tissues is better than that of routine treatment.
分 类 号:R245.311[医药卫生—针灸推拿学] R245.316[医药卫生—中医临床基础]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222