检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张作为[1] 史海滨[1] 李祯[1] 刘德平[1] 闫建文[1] 彭遵原 倪东宁
机构地区:[1]内蒙古农业大学水利与土木建筑工程学院,呼和浩特010018
出 处:《灌溉排水学报》2014年第4期26-30,共5页Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
基 金:国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD29B03)
摘 要:对比研究了不同灌水处理下立体种植模式和单作模式下各作物水分利用效率及产量的变化。结果表明,立体种植模式下,向日葵水分利用效率均低于单作的50%,而小麦、玉米通过适当的水分调控可使其水分利用效率达到甚至超过其单作模式下的50%,且小麦/玉米立体种植模式下作物需水量显著高于小麦/向日葵立体种植模式。立体种植模式下,灌水总量偏少时,小麦产量较高,玉米产量偏低且随灌水总量增加而明显升高,但不同水分处理对向日葵产量的影响无明显规律。小麦/向日葵立体种植模式下,WS-4处理为当地最适宜灌水模式。The changes of crop water use efficiencies and yields in the three-dimensional planting mode and monoculture mode were studied comparatively under different irrigation treatments. The results showed that water use efficiency of sunflower in the three-dimensional planting mode was lower than 50% water use efficiency of sunflower in the monoculture mode. Furthermore, crop water demand of wheat-maize intercropping was significantly higher than that of wheat-sunflower intercropping. In the three-dimensional planting mode, the less irrigation amount, the higher wheat yield was higher while maize yield was lower and increased significantly with the increase of irrigation amount. The different water treatments had no significant effect on yield of sunflower in the three-dimensional planting mode. Finally, the optimum irrigation schedule was WS- 4 treatment of wheat-sunflower intercropping in the local area.
关 键 词:立体种植模式 小麦间作玉米 小麦间作向日葵 水分利用效率 产量
分 类 号:S311[农业科学—作物栽培与耕作技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.237