检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王翠翠[1] 魏永霞[1,2,3]
机构地区:[1]东北农业大学水利与建筑学院,哈尔滨150030 [2]黑龙江省粮食产能提升协同创新中心,哈尔滨150030 [3]黑龙江省高校节水农业重点实验室,哈尔滨150030
出 处:《灌溉排水学报》2014年第4期414-418,共5页Journal of Irrigation and Drainage
基 金:国家科技支撑计划项目(2014BAD12B01);东北农业大学博士基金项目;国家农业综合开发东北黑土区水土流失综合治理项目
摘 要:选用AR模型和基于小波分解的GM(1,1)-AR模型,模拟和预测北安市红星农场径流小区内鼠洞、鼠洞+垄向区田、鼠洞+暗管、鼠洞+暗管+垄向区田和无措施处理的坡耕地耕层土壤水分。结果表明,该2种模型预测精度均较高,其中基于小波分解的GM(1,1)-AR模型预测精度高于AR模型,基于小波分解的GM(1,1)-AR模型和AR模型的预测平均相对误差分别为3.18%和7.3%。The AR model and GM(1,1)-AR model based on wavelet decomposing were applied to forecast the soil moisture of 5 runoff plots in Bei'an Hongxing farm, including mole drain, the combinations of mole drain and subsurface pipe, mole drain and furrow damming, mole drain and subsurface pipe and furrow damming, conventional treatment. The results showed that: prediction accuracy of the two models were both higher, the accuracy of GM(1,1)-AR based on wavelet decomposition was higher compared to AR model, and the relative errors of GM(1,1)-AR model and AR model in average were 3.18% and 7.3%, respectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222