检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学牵引动力国家重点实验室,四川成都610031
出 处:《机车电传动》2014年第4期37-41,共5页Electric Drive for Locomotives
摘 要:为了分析不同轴承布置方式对大功率机车传动系统的影响,运用Romax软件从电机枢轴弯曲变形、轴承寿命和齿轮啮合3个方面对目前3种典型传动系统轴承布置方式进行比较,计算结果表明:相比简支式、悬臂式轴承布置方式,两端式轴承布置电机枢轴的弯曲变形量小;轴承滚子承载有所改善,轴承寿命分别提高了2.67倍和23.53倍;齿面接触强度以及齿根弯曲强度显著降低,提高了齿轮强度及寿命。In order to analyze the influence of different bearing arrangement on the high-power locomotive drive system, the bending deformation of the armature axle, beating life and gear mesh were compared by Romax Designer software. The result indicated that compared with simply supported bracing structure and cantilever bracing structure, the two-terminal bracing structure had less amount of bending deformation, bearing life of which was increased by 2.67 times and 23.53 times owing to the improved working-condition of bearing rollers, and tooth contact strength as well as tooth bending strength of which were significantly reduced, thereby improving the gear strength and life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222