检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐炳燕[1] 黎四平[1] 彭琪[1] 梁丽芸[1] 叶俊琴
机构地区:[1]广东医学院附属石龙博爱医院检验科,广东东莞523325
出 处:《吉林医学》2014年第22期4845-4846,共2页Jilin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:比较强直性脊柱炎患者HLA-B27常用的三种检测方法的特点,探讨不同检测方法之间差异及各自优缺点,为临床检验提供参考。方法:采用ELISA法、RT-PCR法和流式细胞法,对120例强直性脊柱炎患者和100例正常对照人群进行HLA-B27检测,并对结果进行分析。结果:ELISA法、RT-PCR法和流式细胞法三种检测方法的敏感性、特异性和阳性、阴性预测值分别为83.3%、94.0%、94.3%、82.5%;95.8%、93.0%、94.3%、94.8%;93.3%、95.0%、95.7%、92.2%。结论:三种血清HLA-B27检测方法诊断AS的特异度均较高;PCR法和流式细胞法的敏感度均显著高于ELISA法,其中PCR法略高于流式细胞术。Objective To compare three different detection methods of HLA-B27 in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and to explore the differences including their advantages and disadvantages of the three detection methods,to provide reference for clinical diagno-sis. Method The HLA-B27 of 120 cases of patients with ankylosing spondylitis and 100 healthy control subjects were detected by ELIsA, RT-pCR and flow cytometry method,and the results were analyzed. Results The sensitivity,specificity,and positive and negative predic-tive values by ELIsA,RT-pCR and flow cytometry method were 83. 3%,94. 0%,94. 3%,82. 5%;95. 8%,93. 0%,94. 3%,94. 8%;93. 3%,95. 0%,95. 7%,92. 2%. Conclusion Three specificity of serum HLA-B27 by all three methods are high;The sensitivity of pCR method and flow cytometry were significantly higher than ELIsA.
关 键 词:强直性脊柱炎 人类白细胞抗原B27 流式细胞术
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28