密取封缄物行为之定性  被引量:3

Qualitative Study on Behavior of Taking away the Property from a Sealed Object

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:刘博涵[1] 

机构地区:[1]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210023

出  处:《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2014年第3期250-252,共3页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators

摘  要:司法实践中,认定封缄物属性时,要结合财物的外部特征、内容物、作用效果三要素进行判断。密取封缄物构成侵占罪或盗窃罪。"占有"是区分侵占罪与盗窃罪的形式标准,刑法应有限承认观念占有,从而确认委托人对受托人控制下的封缄物之内容物的占有;"管理"是区分侵占罪与盗窃罪的实质标准,侵害有管理权限的财物成立侵占罪,管理权限的有无应以是否承担占有财物毁损风险的标准进行判断。In judicial practice , the identification of the properties of sealed object should be judged through being combined with its external characteristics ,contents,and effect.Taking away the property from a sealed object can constitute embezzlement or theft .“Possession” is the formal standard to distinguish between embezzlement and theft,Criminal Law should limitedly admit conceptual possession and then confirm the client ’ s possession of the contents of sealed object which is controlled by the trustee .“Management” is the essential standard to distinguish between embezzlement and theft .The trustee infringe the property which he has administration authority constitutes embezzlement .Whether the trustee has administration authority can be judged from whether he takes the risk of pos-session property damage .

关 键 词:封缄物 侵占罪 盗窃罪 

分 类 号:D924.35[政治法律—刑法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象