检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:潘炜
机构地区:[1]临夏州人民医院创伤骨科,甘肃临夏731100
出 处:《甘肃医药》2014年第9期659-661,共3页Gansu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:观察不同置管持续冲洗引流方法用于化脓性骨髓炎的实际疗效。方法:选择76例化脓性骨髓炎患者,随机分为观察组38例,采用负压封闭引流术(VSD)进行治疗,以及对照组38例,采用闭式灌洗引流(CCD)进行治疗,记录两组患者1年复发率及2年复发率并进行比较。结果:观察组1年复发率为2.63%(1/38),对照组为15.79%(6/38),组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组2年复发率为21.05%(8/38),对照组为39.47%(15/38),组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:VSD用于化脓性骨髓炎的治疗,较传统CCD方法疗效显著,值得临床推广应用。Objective:To observe the continuous irrigation and drainage catheter method for the actual efficacy suppurative osteomyelitis. Methods: 76 cases of pyogenic osteomyelitis patients, 38 cases were randomly divided into observation group, the useof vacuum sealing drainage( VSD ) for treatment, and a control group of 38 patients with closed lavage( CCD ) for treatment, record two groups of patients 1 year and 2-year recurrence rate and recurrence rate were compared. Results: The 1-year recurrence rate was 2.63%(1/38), the control group was 15.79%(6/38), between the two groups was statistically significant (P〈0.05) differences; observation group 2-year recurrence rate was 21.05%(8/38), the control group was 39.47%(15/38) between the two groups was statistically significant (P〈0.05) differences. Conclusion: VSD for the treatment of osteomyelitis, compared with the traditional method of CCD significant effect, worthy of clinical application.
分 类 号:R274.912[医药卫生—中西医结合]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.39.45