检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘翔[1]
出 处:《泰山学院学报》2014年第4期111-116,共6页Journal of Taishan University
摘 要:新修改的《民事诉讼法》第247条的出台,重新明确了法院自行拍卖的权力。从传统委托拍卖制度的确立到网络司法拍卖的推行,司法拍卖市场化改革的思路屡遭诘问,司法拍卖制度的调整势在必行。网络司法拍卖契合了当下司法改革的需要并得到有效推广,对传统委托拍卖制度产生变革性的影响。但其合法性及法律关系需要进一步明确,其合理性也在经受实践的检验。同时,对路径依赖、利益博弈等因素应进行充分的考量,以权力制约为中心的规制制度也应得到相应的完善。The new changes of 247^th provision in civil procedure law make it clear that judicial auction power is belong to court. In the process that the establishment of the traditional trust auction system evolved to the implementation of the online judicial auction, the thought of judicial auction reform is heckled frequendy. The adjustment of judicial auction system is imperative. The online judicial auetion fits the need of judicial auction reform so that it can be promoted effectively. online judicial auction has a transformative impact on As a new path of the reform of the judicial auction, the traditional trust auction system. Nonetheless, not holy its legitimacy and legal relations need to be clarified, but also its rationality need to be examined by pratice. Meanwhile, many factors such as path dependence, different interests should be fully considered and regulation system should be perfected to find the development path of judicial auction system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3