美国反垄断法规制限制竞争协议的两大规则研究  

On the Two Rules in Contract of Regulating the Restriction of Competition of the U.S.Anti-Monopoly Law

作　　者：张骏[1] 

机构地区：[1]华侨大学法学院,福建泉州362021

出　　处：《中北大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第4期39-44,共6页Journal of North University of China：Social Science Edition

基　　金：福建省社科规划青年项目:转售价格维持反垄断法规制的完善研究(2013C010)

摘　　要：限制竞争协议通常具有反竞争效果,因此需对其进行规制。美国反垄断法规制限制竞争协议的方式有两种,即本身违法规则和合理规则。在这两种规则的适用过程中,又出现了新的变形——非严格本身违法规则和快速合理规则。而在这两个规则的理论研究上,也出现了两分法、三分法、目的分析法及极端举证责任分析法的争鸣。Because of the anti-competitive effects of a contract of restricting competition,the contract needs to be regulated.This paper focuses on studying the U.S.anti-monopoly regulatory approaches,that is,per se rules and rule of reason.In the course of the application of these two rules,there appeared new forms,such as non-strict per se rule and truncated rule of reason.In this theoretical research on the two rules,there have been many debates,such as dichotomy,trichotomy,the purpose of analysis and the extreme burden of proof analysis.

关 键 词：美国反垄断法规 竞争协议 非严格本身违法规则 快速合理规则 

分 类 号：DF414[政治法律—经济法学]