检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高全喜[1,2]
机构地区:[1]北京航空航天大学高研院 [2]北京航空航天大学法学院
出 处:《法学评论》2014年第5期25-33,共9页Law Review
摘 要:中国宪法学现有的公民研究都集中在公民的基本权利这一主题之上,本文运用政治宪法学的视角和方法,突破已有的研究范式,来讨论公民身份和公民本身的含义和历史渊源。在当前中国社会转型大背景之下,针对中国宪制道路所面对的"非常政治"与"日常政治"之间的转换困难,本文提出运用富有建构意义和平衡意义的"宪法政治",来推进中国的公民身份和公民社会建设进程,寻求克服反法治的激进主义所可能造成的危害。The present studies on citizen in China ' s constitutional jurisprudence are roughly focused on the theme of citizens ' basic rights. With the application of the view and method of political constitutional jurisprudence, this paper seeks to surpass the research paradigm available now, in order to discuss the senses and historical origins of citizen and citizenship. Against the background of China' s transition, especially against the transitional difficulty of China' s constitutional road from ' critical politics' to ' normal politics', this paper tries to employ the constructive ' constitutional politics ' with much sense of balance, with the aim to promote China' s process of the construction of citizenship and civil society, and to avoid the possible danger of radicalism which is opposed to rule of law.
分 类 号:D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90