检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学附属省立医院皮肤科,合肥230001
出 处:《安徽医科大学学报》2014年第9期1345-1347,共3页Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(编号:81101186)
摘 要:将108例面部脂溢性角化病患者随机分为3组,分别用Q开关Nd:YAG 532 nm激光、铒激光和强脉冲光(IPL)治疗,根据患者每次治疗前的照片评估治疗效果及不良反应。结果显示3种治疗方法停工期比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),IPL组优于Q开关532 nm激光组及铒激光组;患者疼痛度的比较差异无统计学意义;3种治疗方法均安全有效,有效率和术后局部色素改变比较差异均无统计学意义。Abstract 108 patients with facial seborrheic keratosis were randomly divided into three groups,which were treated with Q-switched Nd:YAG 532 nm laser, erbium laser and intense pulsed light respectively. The assessment of effect and adverse reactions were based on the photos before each treatment. Three methods of treatment of downtime comparative difference was statistically significant. Intense pulsed light group was better than that of Q-switched 532 nm and erbium laser group. There was no statistically significant difference compared with the patients pain degrees. Three methods were safe and effective treatment. Efficient and postoperative local pigment change comparative differences had no statistical significance.
关 键 词:脂溢性角化病 Q开关532 nm激光 铒激光 强脉 冲光
分 类 号:R758.731[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学] R454.2[医药卫生—临床医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28