检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]复旦大学生命科学学院生物多样性与生态工程教育部重点实验室,上海200433
出 处:《植物生理学报》2014年第8期1255-1258,共4页Plant Physiology Journal
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81373963和30925004)
摘 要:通过对两种miRNA提取方法——一步法和多步法进行比较研究,以期获得较高质量的蒙古黄芪不同器官的miRNA。实验结果表明,两种方法均可用于蒙古黄芪miRNA提取,二者存在着不同的优缺点,多步法提取成功率较高但步骤繁琐,相比之下一步法实验条件要求严苛但步骤简单、快捷省时,提取的蒙古黄芪miRNA完整性好,可以满足荧光定量PCR等进一步实验需要。In order to obtain better quality miRNA in different parts of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus, two miRNA extraction methods (one-step method and multi-step method) were compared. The results showed that these two methods had different advantages and disadvantages, but both of them could be used for miRNA extraction. Multi-step method had higher success rate with cumbersome steps, one-step method needed strict experimental conditions but fast and time-saving, the miRNA isolated with one-step method had high integrity which could be used for quantitative RT-PCR and so on.
分 类 号:S567.239[农业科学—中草药栽培]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112