检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈建飞[1] 黄坤全[1] 赵期康[1] 王建芳[1] 刘京山[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学首钢医院,北京100144
出 处:《中国医刊》2014年第9期51-53,共3页Chinese Journal of Medicine
摘 要:目的评价经半月线切口在阑尾切除术中的临床应用效果。方法将2010年12月至2013年12月期间,在本院行432例阑尾切除术患者,随机分为半月线切口组(改良组)和右腹前外侧肌群切口组(传统组),并对其疗效进行对比分析。结果改良组在手术时间、术后住院时间、切口感染率、术后疼痛程度等方面明显低于传统组(P<0.01);而单纯性阑尾炎患者的术后切口感染率,两组差异不显著(P>0.01)。结论经半月线切口切除阑尾具有操作简单、安全、并发症少的优点,特别适用于肥胖患者、化脓性和坏疽性阑尾炎患者,临床疗效优于传统组。Objective To evaluate the semilunar line incision in open appendectomy. Method 432 cases of appen-dectomy were adopted the semilunar line incision ( improved group) or abdominal anterolateral muscle incision ( tra-ditional group) respectively in random in Peking University Shougang Hospital during December in 2010 to Decem-ber in 2013, then we analysis its effect comparativley. Result The improved group was significantly less than the traditional group in the operation time, postoperative hospital stay, the infection rate of the wound, postoperative pain degree for the suppurative, gangrenous appendectomy (P〈0. 01). It was no differences for the rates of the wound infection between the two groups in the simple appendicitis excision patients (P〉0. 01). Conclusion This method is being simple to operate, safety, less complications through semilunar line incision. The clinical effect is especially better than the traditional group with the obese patients, suppurative and gangrenous appendicitis pa-tients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.72