技术效率、技术进步与文化产业全要素生产率分析  

Technical Efficiency,Technical Progress and TFP Productivity of Cultural Industries

作　　者：钟廷勇[1] 周磊[2] 安烨[2] 

机构地区：[1]重庆工商大学会计学院,重庆400067 [2]东北师范大学商学院,长春130117

出　　处：《商业研究》2014年第9期14-20,共7页Commercial Research

基　　金：吉林省社科基金项目,项目编号:2012BS71;中央高校基本科研业务专项资金,项目编号:12SSXT122

摘　　要：通过采用三阶段DEA-Malmquist面板模型,本文对1999-2009年我国文化产业的数据进行实证检验,对我国文化产业整体、地区间和行业间全要素生产率进行了研究,发现文化产业全要素生产率较低,且波动率较大;随着文化体制改革的推进,文化产业全要素生产率的动力变为技术进步,而技术效率中纯技术效率持续恶化,规模效率得到了初步改善;文化产业全要素生产率存在较大的地区间差异性,其中东部地区最高,中部地区次之,东北地区和西部地区最低;地区经济发展程度、金融市场完善程度、政府扶持力度、城市化进程和初始人力资本,对文化产业生产效率产生重要影响,文化产业全要素生产率在各细分行业间表现出较大的差异性。An empirical study is conducted to estimate China′s cultural industries data from 1999 to 2009 , using a Three-Stage-DEA-Malmquist model , and studies the overall cultural industries , and TFP between regions and indus-tries.The findings of this study show that the TFP of cultural industries is low and the volatility is heavy ; as the develop-ment of the reform of cultural administrative system , the main driving power is technical progress , but the technical effi-ciency is worse while the scale efficiency turns better;the TFP of cultural industries in the eastern region is the most effi-cient while the western region and northeast region are the least efficient;regional economic development level , financial market′s perfect degree , the government support intensity , the process of urbanization and the initial human capital , they have important effects on TFP of cultural industries .TFP of culture industries shows a great difference in the indus-try subdivision.

关 键 词：文化产业 全要素生产率 三阶段DEA—Malmquist 技术效率 技术进步 

分 类 号：F062.9[经济管理—政治经济学]