检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈海萍[1]
机构地区:[1]上海政法学院法律学院
出 处:《环球法律评论》2014年第5期99-111,共13页Global Law Review
摘 要:从英国行政法上合法预期原则40多年的发展看,合法预期保护从程序保护模式快速发展到了实体保护模式,从传统保守审查标准挺进到了新型开放标准,并从司法有限自我克制进入到了深度实质性审查。但在"公平"、"权力滥用"和"良好行政"等流行概念的纠缠下,合法预期原则在某种程度上丧失了其独特的行政法功能。有学者敏锐地提出了正本清源之策,主张"公民对政府的独特信任"之说为保护规范原理,从而为预期的合法性并给予保护提供了规则建构基础。观察当前合法预期案例,体现合法预期保护方式和深度的司法审查标准与强度也正发生激烈变化,曾一统天下的温斯伯里不合理审查标准和强度已被冲击与分化,在某些领域正被权衡原则和比例原则逐渐取代,英国合法预期保护原则的功能正发生着结构性调整。During the past forty years, the doctrine of legitimate expectations has de- veloped from procedural protection to substantive protection, from traditional standard to a new- type open standard, from orthodox non-interventionist review to in-depth substantive review. However, the doctrine has to some extent lost its unique administrative law function as a result of its entanglement with such popular concepts as "fairness", "abuse of power" and "good ad- ministration", which provide little guidance within the context of a legitimate expectations case. Some scholars advocate the normative principle of "the distinct trust of the governed in the pub- lic authority", thereby providing a basis for the making of the relevant rules. While judicial re- view is concerned with what decisions may be reached, both the standards and intensity of re- view are evolving quickly in modern case law. The " Wednesbury unreasonableness standard" is alive and well, albeit it is gradually swept aside by the principle of proportionality in some are- as. The function of the principle of legitimate expectations is undergoing a process of structural adjustment.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15