检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李激汉[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2014年第10期165-172,共8页Hebei Law Science
基 金:2011教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目<后金融危机时代公司治理创新研究>(11YJA820083)阶段性成果
摘 要:股东对外转让股权合同效力以及规避股东优先购买权合同效力的争议均集中于股东购买权性质,然而,目前法院对股权性质的认识仍停留于对权利行使方式的考察,而未有对权利背后具体基础关系的探究,因此形成了理解上的本末倒置。股东优先购买权的基础关系是公司组织合同关系,因此,将其定性为请求权比较妥当。规避股东优先购买权是因为其效力"射程"极为有限。如果根据"请求权说"适当扩展其"射程",将从根本上解决对规避行为进行司法制裁的疑难问题。The dispute on the validity of contract for selling the equity to non-sharehoders as well as the validity of trade which circumvented the privileged allocation to stockholders focus on the nature of the privileged allocation to stockholders, but the basis relationship for creating the privileged allocation to stockholders is not he investigated, thus putting cart before the horse in scholar. The basis relationship for creating the privileged allocation to stockholders is the corporate contract. The privileged allocation to stockholders often is circumvented because of its effectiveness "range" is extremely limited ;if expand its "range" appropriately through judicial interpretation , the problem of punishing the circumvention by judges will be resolved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46