检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曾伟楠[1] 赵旭东[2] 万崇华[1] 谭健烽[1] 禹玉兰[1] 曾家勇[1] 于磊[1]
机构地区:[1]广东医学院人文与管理学院暨生命质量与应用心理研究中心,广东东莞523808 [2]同济大学医学院人文医学与行为科学教研室,上海200092
出 处:《广东医学院学报》2014年第2期247-250,共4页Journal of Guangdong Medical College
基 金:国家科技支撑计划(No.2009BAI77B05);东莞市软科学研究计划(No.201150215200082);广东医学重点学科及科技创新基金(No.STIF201119)
摘 要:目的对29题的系统家庭动力学自评量表进行修订,并检验其在大学生的适用情况。方法在广东省选取两所大学共1 048名大学生并发放问卷,对数据进行主成分分析,结合定性分析进行条目删减,对另一大学生样本共517份数据做验证性因素分析。结果 29题量表最终修订为23题量表,量表各维度Cronbach系数分别是0.838、0.788、0.711、0.688,各维度得分与各效标得分显著相关,显示较好的效标关联效度,验证性因素分析拟合指数较理想,结构效度较好。结论新版系统家庭动力自评量表因子结构更清晰,测量指标符合要求,适合大学生使用。Objective To modify the 29-item self-rating scale of systemic family dynamics and test its applicability in university students. Methods The questionnaires were issued for 1048 students in two universities in Guangdong province. The items were modified using principal component analysis and qualitative analysis. The confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the data from another 517 university students. Results The original 29-item scale was revised as 23-item scale. Cronbach α coefficients of the four dimensions were 0.838, 0.788, 0.711 and 0.688, and the scores of four dimensions were correlated with those of criteria. The revised scale showed good criterion-related validity. The construct validity was testified by confirmatory factor analysis. Conclusion The new version of self-rating scale of systemic family dynamics possesses clear factor structure and reasonable measurement indexes, which is applicable in university students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200