德沃金视域下的宪法“道德解读”及其前景展望  

A“Moral Reading”of the Constitution Enlightened by Dworkin and Its Prospects

作　　者：聂长建[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南民族大学法学院

出　　处：《安徽大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第5期117-124,共8页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目(09XFX001)

摘　　要："道德解读"在美国声名狼藉,却又在司法实践中功劳卓著。"做得却说不得"的道德解读的两个面向"貌离神合":真诚造就大法官的英明,谎言促成大法官的提名!德沃金批驳了对道德解读赋予法官绝对权力和反对民主的两大指控,分析了道德解读是如何保护公民权利的,为道德解读正名,使道德解读由"做得"走向"说得"。在我国,宪法进入诉讼能够体现宪法作为根本大法的权威,宪法的"道德解读"应该进入实质性探讨阶段。In America,'moral reading'is infamous,while enjoying credit in judicial practice.The two faces of'may doing'instead of'may saying'in moral reading have different appearances but the same spirit.Sincerity brings the brilliant to grand justice,while lie helps to bring about the nomination to grand justice.Dworkin also refuted the two charges of moral reading:to give absolute power to the judge and to run against democracy.He analyzed how moral reading can be adopted to protect the rights of citizen,by rectifying misunderstanding of moral reading and shifting moral reading from 'may doing'to'may saying'.In China,constitution entering lawsuit may embody the authority of constitution which is regarded as a fundamental charter,and'moral reading'of the constitution should be entered into the materiality discuss phase.

关 键 词：道德解读 德沃金 宪法 权利 

分 类 号：DF03[政治法律—法学理论]