检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:连宁芳[1] 陈公平[1] 邓朝胜[1] 金咏絮[1] 高少勇[1]
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学附属第一医院呼吸内科,福州350005
出 处:《福建医科大学学报》2014年第3期190-193,共4页Journal of Fujian Medical University
基 金:福建省卫生厅面向农村和城市社区推广项目(2013015)
摘 要:目的:研究以一秒率(FEV1/FVC)固定临界值70%,占预计值92%和正常值低限(LLN)为诊断标准对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患病率的影响。方法选择2013年1-12月进行肺功能检查的体检者开展以医院为现场的流行病学调查,将符合标准的617例患者分别按照以下诊断标准计算COPD的患病率:(1)FEV1/FVC<复旦大学附属中山医院计算出的一秒率LLN(LLN中山);(2)《慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球防治倡议》(GOLD)标准(FEV1/FVC <70%);(3)FEV1/FVC<复旦大学附属中山医院计算出的预计值×92%;(4)FEV1/FVC<哈尔滨医科大学公共卫生学院计算出的LLN预计值(LLN哈)。比较以上几种诊断方法COPD的患病率和诊断一致性。结果以LLN中山为标准COPD的总患病率为16.7%,<40岁人群患病率3.9%,40~59岁人群患病率11.1%,60~69岁人群患病率17.4%,>70岁人群患病率28.1%。GOLD 标准40~59岁人群患病率4.8%,低于LLN中山,>70岁人群患病率36.3%,高于LLN中山(P<0.05),余年龄组与总患病率差别无统计学意义;各组的诊断一致率为87.6%~96.1%。方法(3)、方法(4)与方法(1)比较,各年龄组人群患病率与总患病率差别均无统计学意义(P>0.05),诊断一致率95.4%~100%。结论以GOLD标准作为COPD诊断标准可能造成低年龄组漏诊和高年龄组过度诊断。以 FEV1/FVC预计值×92%与以 LLN中山为标准诊断COPD一致性好,可考虑作为COPD的诊断标准。Objective To investigate the impact of using fixed ratio 70% ,the prediction of FEV1/FVC plus 0 .92 ,the lower limit of normal (LLN) for FEV1/FVC as cut-off point for diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on the prevalence of COPD . Methods An epidemiological study was carried out in physical examination people who had pulmonary function test in the First Affiliated Hos-pital of Fujian Medical University from January 1 ,2013 to December 30 ,2013 . 617 patients were en-rolled and diagnosed as COPD by different spirometric criteria as follows . (1) FEV1/FVC 〈 LLNA , which was calculated from the data of zhongshan hospital in 2010 ;(2) GOLD criteria ,that is FEV1/FVC〈70% ;(3) FEV1/FVC〈0 .92 plus the predictive value of FEV1/FVC from Zhongshan Hospital ,Fudan University in 2010 ;(4) FEV1/FVC〈LLNB ,which was provided by haerbing Medical College in 2001 . The different prevalence was compared and the diagnostic concordance rate was calculated . Results With criteria LLNA ,the prevalence was 16 .7% ,with 3 .9% under 40 years old ,11 .1% between 40~59 years old ,17 .4% between 60~69 years old and 28 .1% over 70 years old .With GOLD criteria ,the preva-lence of 40~59 years old was lower than criteria LLNA ,while the prevalence of over 70 years old group was higher than LLNA (P〈0 .05) . The diagnostic concordance rate was 87 .6% ~96 .1% . The preva-lence of COPD was similar with criteria LLNA ,criteria LLNB and criteria (3) ,the diagnostic concordance rate was 95 .4% ~100% . Conclusions Using GOLD criteria as cut-off to diagnose COPD may result in missed diagnosis in low age and over diagnosis in old age . The diagnostic concordance rate of LLNA and 0 .92 plus prediction values of FEV1/FVC was high ,so 0 .92 plus prediction values of FEV1/FVC maybe a good new way to diagnose COPD .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15