检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨晴[1] 李婧实[1] 郭艾英[1] 齐艳玲[1] 李彦生[1] 张风娟[2]
机构地区:[1]河北科技师范学院生命科技学院,河北昌黎066600 [2]河北大学生命科学院,河北保定071400
出 处:《应用生态学报》2014年第9期2536-2542,共7页Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基 金:河北省科技厅项目(10225520);国家自然科学基金项目(31171906);河北省自然基科学金项目(C2011407023)资助
摘 要:为了防控黄顶菊进一步在国内蔓延,明确黄顶菊的生长机制迫在眉睫.本研究设不同遮阴程度(0、50%和80%)和种植方式(黄顶菊单种、藜单种、两者混种)共9个处理,研究遮阴和种植方式对两种植物出苗率、光合荧光和生长特性的影响.结果表明:适度遮阴有利于黄顶菊出苗,但是出苗不整齐,这是造成黄顶菊入侵性强的一个重要因素.随着光照强度的增强,两种植物净光合速率(Pn)、光化学猝灭(qP)、PSⅡ电子传递速率(ETR)、实际量子产量(Y)、非光化学猝灭(qN)、水分利用效率(WUE)、茎生物量比(SMR)、冠宽(CW)和干物质积累量(DM)都增加,而比叶面积(SLA)降低;黄顶菊叶生物量比(LMR)显著增加,而藜不显著;黄顶菊DM增幅比藜的增幅高.80%遮阴下,藜Pn和DM都高于黄顶菊.自然光下,黄顶菊Pn、qN、WUE和相对竞争强度(RCI)最高,混种黄顶菊CW、DM和混种藜Pn、Y显著低于相应的单种处理.黄顶菊的光饱和点(LSP)和光补偿点(LCP)均比藜高.因此,黄顶菊耐阴能力比藜弱,两种植物都是通过增加SLA和降低LMR来适应弱光;黄顶菊适应强光的能力大于藜,自然光下混种黄顶菊通过增加SMR和降低CW来提高竞争力.It is necessary to elucidate its growth mechanism in order to prevent and control the further spread of Flaveria bidentis, an invasive plant in China. The effects of shading (shading rate of 0, 50% and 80%, respectively) and planting pattern (single cropping of F. bidentis, single cropping of Chenopodium album and their intercropping) on germination rate, fluorescence characteristics and growth characteristics of the two plants were investigated. The results showed that moderate shading contributed to emergence rate, but emergence rate of F. bidentis was not uniform, which was one of important factors as a stronger invader. With the increasing light intensity, net photosynthetic rate (Pn), photochemical quenching (qP), electron transport rate of PSⅡ(ETR), quantum yield of PSⅡ(Y), nonphotochemical quenching (qN), water use efficiency (WUE), shoot biomass rate (SMR), crown width (CW) and dry biomass (DM) increased, specific leaf area (SLA) decreased, LMR of F. bidentis significantly increased, LMR of C. album changed insignificantly, and the increment of DM of F. bidentis was higher than that of C. album. In 80% shade treatment, Pn and DM of F. bidentis were lower than those of C. album. In natural light treatment, Pn, qN, WUE and relative competitive index (RCI) were the highest, CW and DM of intercropped F. bidentis and Pn, Y of C. album were significantly lower than that of the respective single treatment. F. bidentis had higher light saturation point (LSP) and light compensation point (LCP). In conclusion, the shadetolerant ability of F. bidentis was weaker than that of C. album, but it was reversed in natural light treatment. The two plants adapted to the weak light in 80% shade treatment by increasing SLA and decreasing LMR. F. bidentis improved competition under natural light by increasing SMR and decreasi
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112