检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁虹[1]
出 处:《中国实用医药》2014年第26期16-17,共2页China Practical Medicine
摘 要:目的 探讨2型糖尿病药物强化治疗与常规治疗的临床效果差异。方法 46例2型糖尿病患者,随机分为对照组23例,实验组23例。实验组给予2型糖尿病药物强化治疗,对照组给予2型糖尿病的常规治疗。对比和观察两组患者临床疗效。结果 经治疗3个月后,实验组患者空腹血糖在4.0-7.0mmol/L。对照组患者空腹血糖均在7.0 mmol/L以上。两组差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论 2型糖尿病药物强化治疗较常规治疗临床效果显著,值得临床推广使用。Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy differences between drug intensive treatment and conventional treatment of type 2 diabetes. Methods A total of 46 cases of type 2 diabetes were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, and each group contained 23 cases. The experimental group was treated by drug intensive treatment for type 2 diabetes, and the control group received conventional treatment of type 2 diabetes. Clinical efficacy of the two groups" were observed and compared. Results After 3-month treatment, the fasting plasma glucose of the experimental group was 4.0~7.0mmol/L, and that of the control group was above 7.0 mmol/L. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion Drug intensive treatment of type 2 diabetes has more obvious clinical efficacy than conventional treatment, and it is worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.172.41