检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵明秀[1] 张晓敏[1] 史梅容[2] 魏彦会 李海防[1]
机构地区:[1]桂林理工大学旅游学院,广西桂林541004 [2]南宁职业技术学院,广西南宁530008
出 处:《北方园艺》2014年第18期84-87,共4页Northern Horticulture
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41261006);国家科技支撑计划课题资助项目(2012BAC16B04);广西科技攻关计划课题资助项目(桂科攻1298006-3)
摘 要:选取广西猫儿山国家级自然保护区的高山矮林、高山杜鹃林、水青冈林、木荷林、杉木林和毛竹林6种典型森林景观,运用层次分析法(AHP法)进行美学评价。结果表明:在猫儿山典型森林景观美学评价指标体系中,生态价值占主要地位,其次是美学价值;现代森林景观美学更注重森林景观自身的生态价值,传统审美观已经改变;6种森林景观中,高山矮林由于其强大的生态价值,综合评价分值最高,处于美学极佳等级,而其它5种典型森林景观都处于优美等级;植物物种多样性和原始森林风貌是影响猫儿山森林景观美学评价的重要景观要素,毛竹林和高山杜鹃林是猫儿山后期旅游开发的重点。该研究旨在深入认识猫儿山自然保护区森林景观美学价值,探讨不同类型森林景观美学价值的主要影响因子,以期为猫儿山生态旅游的深层次开发提供理论依据。Aesthetic evaluation of six typical forest,including Sub-alpine forest,Rhododendron maoerense forest,Fagus sylvaticaforest,Schima superbaforest,Cunninghamia lanceolataforest and Phyllostachys pubescens forest were analyzed by AHP method in Mao'er mountain,Guangxi province.The results showed that in the aesthetic evaluation system,ecological value accounted for more than aesthetic value.Compared to traditional aesthetic,modern aesthetic conceptions put more emphasis on ecological value.The score of sub-alpine forest was the highest because of its powerful ecological function,and the other five forests all belonged to the second degree.Species diversity and virgin forest features played an important role in aesthetic evaluation,and later development of tourism should focus on Rhododendron maoerense forest and Phyllostachys pubescens forest.The study would provide scientific basis for better understanding the relationships between forest aesthetic and its influencing factors,helping for deep development of eco-tourism in Mao'er mountain.
分 类 号:S759.92[农业科学—森林经理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33