探寻政府与市场角色关系的“新共识”  

On “New Consensus” About Relation Between Government and Market

作　　者：顾建光[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学国际与公共事务学院,上海200030

出　　处：《上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2014年第5期34-41,共8页Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘　　要："凯恩斯共识"与"华盛顿共识"分别代表政府干预倾向和反对政府干预的相互对立的认识倾向。二战以后,"凯恩斯共识"为各国政府和学界所普遍接受,政府角色大幅扩张。20世纪70年代中期以来,人们逐步转向"华盛顿共识",或"市场理性主义"。20世纪90年代以来在世界各地多次爆发经济危机及市场失灵表现,致使各国自觉不自觉地摆脱"市场原教旨主义"。论文的独立见解是,现在不在于继续通过某种理论或思辨途径去构建政府与市场间的泾渭界限,需要摆脱非此即彼的思维方式,需要深入批判性地审视市场和政府角色,需要采取具体问题具体分析方法,探讨在社会物品和服务供给过程中,形成政府与市场间的有效配合关系。该研究对众所关注的政府与市场间角色关系思考具有启示意义。Since the mid of last century, the Keynesian Consensus has been accepted by the governments of different countries for recognition of market failures. Based on this consideration, the roles of governments have expanded greatly. Since the mid 70th of last century, attention has gradually been paid to the Washington Consensus or what was referred to as the “market fundamentalism”. The financial crises continually appeared from the 90th of last century, making the governments to avoid the “market rationalism”. It is held in this paper that it is not necessary to make a distinction between the Keynesian Consensus and the Washington Consensus, but it is necessary to reflect the rationality and shortages of these two consensuses, to consider the markets and governments critically, and to construct a cooperative relation between them. The relation should not be formed in a theoretic or reflective way, but from concrete analysis of concrete issues to dynamically form a corporative relation.

关 键 词：凯恩斯共识 华盛顿共识 新共识 制度安排 

分 类 号：F123[经济管理—世界经济] D035[政治法律—政治学]