检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:向桂珍[1] 乐曦[1] 赵永红[1] 胡彬[2] 魏大琼[3]
机构地区:[1]重庆三峡中心医院内分泌科,重庆404000 [2]重庆三峡中心医院老干科,重庆404000 [3]重庆三峡中心医院护理部,重庆404000
出 处:《中国医药导报》2014年第28期98-101,共4页China Medical Herald
基 金:重庆市卫生局科研资助项目(编号20130419z)
摘 要:目的探讨糖尿病学组在非内分泌科糖尿病护理中的运用效果。方法在院内成立糖尿病学组。对非内分泌科护理人员开展系统的糖尿病知识及糖尿病专科技能培训,组织糖尿病专项护理质量检查,制订糖尿病相关护理流程,开展糖尿病护理会诊,开设糖尿病教育门诊,组建糖尿病护理微信及QQ群。最后对组内成员理论知识及操作技能进行评测,并与成立前作比较分析;总分为100分,评价非内分泌科病区糖尿病专项护理质量检测的得分情况,做比较分析。结果培训前学组成员理论知识、胰岛素笔注射操作、血糖仪操作及胰岛素泵操作达标率分别为23.68%、21.05%、39.47%和6.58%,而培训后,除了理论知识达标率为94.74%外,其他均为100.00%,差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.01);培训前非内分泌科病区糖尿病专项护理质量检测得分为(65.00±10.23)分,培训后为(95.00±6.18)分,培训前后比较差异显著,差异有高度统计学意义(P<0.01);完成院内疑难糖尿病护理会诊28次、糖尿病教育门诊接诊788人次,规范了5项糖尿病护理流程,微信及QQ群共有成员321人。学组成员共同完善了糖尿病的会诊流程。结论糖尿病学组对非内分泌专科护理人员实施的糖尿病知识与护理技能培训可以有效提高对糖尿病患者的护理质量。Objective To explore the effect of diabetes study group used in diabetes care in department of non-endocrinology. Methods Diabetes group was established in the hospital. The system of knowledge about diabetes and diabetes specialist skills training was carried out for the nursing staff in department of non-endocrinology, and organized diabetic special nursing quality check, made diabetes related nursing process, carried out diabetes nursing consultation, opened diabetes education clinic, a diabetes care micro message and QQ group. Finally, the members of the group of theoretical knowledge and operating skills were evaluated, and were compared to before the establishment; with a score of 100 for total score, the score of department of non-endocrinology ward diabetic special nursing quality inspection were evaluated, and comparative analyzed. Results Before training, the theory knowledge, insulin pen injection, blood glucose and insulin pump operation success rate were 23.68%, 21.05%, 39.47% and 6.58% respectively, and after the training, the standard rate of theoretical knowledge was 94.74%, the others were 100.00%, with statistically significant differences (P 〈0.01); before the training, department of non-endocrinology ward diabetic special nursing quality detection score was (65.00±10.23), (95.00±6.18) points after training, there was a statistically significant difference between before and after training (P 〈0.01); completed 28 times hospital difficult diabetes care consultation, education outpatient of diabetes had accepted 788 patients, specification 5 diabetes care process, there were 321 members in micro message and QQ group. Study group members improved the diabetes consultation process. Conclusion Diabetes knowledge and nursing skills training that diabetes group carried out to nursing staff in non-endocrine specialist can effectively improvethe quality of nursing care for patients with diabetes.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28