检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘亮[1]
机构地区:[1]华东政法大学
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2014年第3期43-48,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:《行政处罚法》第49条、第56条规定行政相对人对行政机关的部分行政处罚行为有权拒绝。拒绝条款在实际运行中遭遇困境,反而有扩大行政相对人受损权益的倾向。拒绝条款不符合规范的科学性,这一条款在我国行政法律体系中单项突进痕迹明显,缺乏无效行为理论支撑。从弥补法律漏洞的角度看,对拒绝条款进行完善势在必行。Article 49 and 56 of Law on Administrative Penalty specifies the relative person of an administrative organ shall have the right to refuse to be imposed some of administrative penalties. But in practice, exercising the right of refusal is very difficult, sometimes even tend to cause heavier damage to the administrative relative person's rights and interests. These articles are not scientifically specified, and are obviously imbalanced in the development of China's administrative legal system, lacking the support from the theory of invalid behavior. It's imperative to improve these articles of law in order to avoid legal loopholes.
分 类 号:D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117