拒绝条款缘何难以保障“拒绝”——对《行政处罚法》第49条、第56条的分析  

Why Refusing Right Can Not be Protected by Legal Articles: An Analysis of Article 49 and 56 of Law on Administrative Penalty

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:刘亮[1] 

机构地区:[1]华东政法大学

出  处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2014年第3期43-48,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘  要:《行政处罚法》第49条、第56条规定行政相对人对行政机关的部分行政处罚行为有权拒绝。拒绝条款在实际运行中遭遇困境,反而有扩大行政相对人受损权益的倾向。拒绝条款不符合规范的科学性,这一条款在我国行政法律体系中单项突进痕迹明显,缺乏无效行为理论支撑。从弥补法律漏洞的角度看,对拒绝条款进行完善势在必行。Article 49 and 56 of Law on Administrative Penalty specifies the relative person of an administrative organ shall have the right to refuse to be imposed some of administrative penalties. But in practice, exercising the right of refusal is very difficult, sometimes even tend to cause heavier damage to the administrative relative person's rights and interests. These articles are not scientifically specified, and are obviously imbalanced in the development of China's administrative legal system, lacking the support from the theory of invalid behavior. It's imperative to improve these articles of law in order to avoid legal loopholes.

关 键 词:拒绝条款 规范科学性 无效行为 

分 类 号:D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象