不同地震定位方法确定震源深度对比分析  被引量:4

Comparative analysis of focal depth of various location methods

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:杨成荣[1] 

机构地区:[1]新疆维吾尔自治区地震局,中国乌鲁木齐830011

出  处:《地震地磁观测与研究》2014年第3期77-82,共6页Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research

摘  要:使用新疆地震台网地震观测资料,采用MSDP系统单纯型、Locsat、Hypo2000、hypoSAT等4种定位软件和经典直观的中线法、石川法、交切法作图法及BLOC86速度模型计算定位方法,对2010年1月18日19时35分呼图壁M_L 4.0地震分别定位。将各自确定的震源深度、震中参数进行对比分析,认为单纯型定位方法确定的震源深度太浅。Based on the seismologic observation data of Xinjiang Seismic Network,the ML 4.0 earthquake which was occurred in Hutubi at 19∶35 on January 18,2010,is located by using the locating software such as simplex algorithm location method of MSDP system,Locsat,Hypo2000,and HypoSAT.On the other hand,some classical location algorithm such as the midline method,Ishikawa Nori,intersection method,mapping method,and BLOC86 velocity model computing positioning method are also used at the same time.Through comparative analyze and discuss the focal depth and the parameters determined by the two ways,it can be concluded that the focal depth which is determined by using the simplex algorithm is too shallow.

关 键 词:震源深度 多种方法测定 对比分析 

分 类 号:P315.33[天文地球—地震学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象