检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨成荣[1]
机构地区:[1]新疆维吾尔自治区地震局,中国乌鲁木齐830011
出 处:《地震地磁观测与研究》2014年第3期77-82,共6页Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research
摘 要:使用新疆地震台网地震观测资料,采用MSDP系统单纯型、Locsat、Hypo2000、hypoSAT等4种定位软件和经典直观的中线法、石川法、交切法作图法及BLOC86速度模型计算定位方法,对2010年1月18日19时35分呼图壁M_L 4.0地震分别定位。将各自确定的震源深度、震中参数进行对比分析,认为单纯型定位方法确定的震源深度太浅。Based on the seismologic observation data of Xinjiang Seismic Network,the ML 4.0 earthquake which was occurred in Hutubi at 19∶35 on January 18,2010,is located by using the locating software such as simplex algorithm location method of MSDP system,Locsat,Hypo2000,and HypoSAT.On the other hand,some classical location algorithm such as the midline method,Ishikawa Nori,intersection method,mapping method,and BLOC86 velocity model computing positioning method are also used at the same time.Through comparative analyze and discuss the focal depth and the parameters determined by the two ways,it can be concluded that the focal depth which is determined by using the simplex algorithm is too shallow.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117