检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭明军[1] 曾其莉[1] 岳苗苗[1] 张静玲[1] 姚璇[1] 张天宝[1] 黄晓波[1] 陈俐侃[1]
机构地区:[1]湖北省疾病预防控制中心,湖北武汉430079
出 处:《中国消毒学杂志》2014年第9期942-944,947,共4页Chinese Journal of Disinfection
摘 要:目的研究市场上常见的口罩对细颗粒物(PM 2.5)的防护效果,以指导消费者选择和使用。方法采用称重法,对环境空气中PM 2.5和经口罩阻隔后的空气中PM 2.5浓度进行监测,以评价各种口罩对PM 2.5阻隔效率。结果在流量100 L/min条件下,检测了从市场抽样的8种口罩,在空气PM 2.5低于270μg/m3时,有7种口罩能将空气PM 2.5浓度降低到75μg/m3以下,符合二类区域标准要求。一次性外科口罩的阻隔效率低于10%,其他7种口罩的阻隔效率介于72%~97%之间。结论一次性外科口罩对PM 2.5几乎没有防护作用,其他7种口罩对PM 2.5有一定的防护效果。Objective To investigate the protection effect of several popular masks to PM 2. 5 in the market. Methods Weighing method was adopted to monitor the PM 2. 5 average concentration in the ambient air and the air obstructed by masks in order to evaluate protection effect. Results 8 kinds of popular masks were tested. When the air flow rate was controlled to 100 L/min, the concentration of PM 2. 5 in the air could be reduced to 75 μg/m3 by 7 kinds masks while the concentration of PM 2. 5 in the ambient air was below 270 μg/m3 , which was according with the demand of GB 3095 - 2012. The obstruction efficiency of these 7 masks was between 72% -97%, except that of the disposable surgery mask whose ef- ficiency was below 10%. Conclusion There was hardly any protection effect of the disposable surgery mask, while the other 7 masks performed certain protection to PM 2. 5.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15