检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗万军[1] 马敬伟[1] 徐润琳[1] 王文娟[1] 许渝[1] 周涛[1]
机构地区:[1]武汉市妇女儿童医疗保健中心,湖北武汉430016
出 处:《中国消毒学杂志》2014年第9期948-950,共3页Chinese Journal of Disinfection
基 金:武汉市卫生局科研项目(WG12C09)
摘 要:目的了解医院消毒与灭菌效果状况,分析存在问题,为加强医院感染与消毒管理提供参考。方法通过回顾性调查方法,对某医院消毒管理和消毒灭菌质量状况进行监测与分析。结果常规监测成本明显高于特殊情况监测,并逐年增加;常规监测阳性率明显低于特殊情况监测。常规监测中医务人员手、紫外线等和使用中消毒剂阳性率较高;特殊情况监测中物体表面、医务人员手、消毒器械阳性率较高。结论常规卫生消毒监测费用较高,其监测标本阳性率与医院感染率之间相关性不明确。Objective To know the hospital disinfection and sterilization effect situation, analyze problems, provide refer- ence for strengthening the management of nosocomial infection and disinfection. Methods Retrospective investigation was used to monitor and analyze the quality of disinfection management and sterilization effect. Results Routine monitoring costs which increased year by year was significantly higher than special circumstances monitoring, the positive rate of routine monitoring was significantly lower than special circumstances monitoring. The hands of medical staff, ultraviolet, disinfectants had higher positive rate in routine monitoring while the surface, the hands of medical staff and equipment which had been disinfected had higher positive rate in special circumstances monitoring. Condusion The total cost of routine monitoring is significantly higher than special circumstances monitoring. While the correlation between the positive rate and the hospital infection rate is not clear.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249