基于ESI科学家计量方法的重新评估  

Counting Methods and Economist Ranking Based on ESI

作　　者：杨毓丽[1] 单承伟[1] 张苏[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学图书馆,大连116024

出　　处：《情报杂志》2014年第9期76-82,共7页Journal of Intelligence

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"基于ESI数据库的学科文献计量研究"(编号:DUT13RW431)

摘　　要：以ESI排名前5位的经济学家为统计对象,通过选择六种作者贡献率分配算法,对5位经济学家论文总数、总被引频次排名和篇均被引频次三个指标进行了重新评价。研究结果表明:从总被引频次来看,除了Harmonic counting和FLAE排名一致外,其他几种算法的排名完全不同,而且排名的差异非常大。从篇均被引频次来说,六种计量方法排序结果完全一致。This paper describes the results of top 5 economists from ESI database using six different counting approaches-i. e. , fractional counting, harmonic counting, Arithmetic counting. The data of total citation, citation per paper, and sum of papers are reevaluated. Findings show that the other three counting approaches result in observable differences in total citation ranks except harmonic counting, which agrees with a FLAE counting. From the perspective of citation per paper, the results of these six counting methods are the same.

关 键 词：ESI 合著者 贡献率 总被引频次 篇均被引频次 

分 类 号：G354.2[文化科学—情报学]