检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈述祥[1] 刘彦[1] 区文欢[1] 康乐[1] 陈丽君[2]
机构地区:[1]暨南大学附属江门中医院骨伤科二区,广东江门529031 [2]暨南大学附属江门中医院康复科,广东江门529031
出 处:《泸州医学院学报》2014年第4期423-426,共4页Journal of Luzhou Medical College
基 金:广东省江门市科技计划项目(江科[2013]01-9)
摘 要:目的:通过对全髋关节翻修术后随访病例进行分析,探讨髋臼侧翻修时处理各类型骨缺损的方法选择及其早期疗效。方法:对46例髋关节置换术后髋臼骨缺损的患者进行翻修,观察术后随访X线片上的髋臼假体及周围骨质变化情况,并对髋关节行Harris功能评定和VAS评分。结果:46例获得随访,随访时间13~83个月,平均随访41.8个月,髋关节Hariss评分平均由全髋关节翻修术前的(53.15±11.41)分(29~67分)提高至翻修术后12月的(91.23±3.43)(83~98分)(P〈0.05)。疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分平均由全髋关节翻修术前的(7.8±1.1)分(5~10分)减低至翻修术后12月的(1.2±1.2)分(0~3分)(P〈0.05)。结论:全髋关节翻修术中,根据不同的翻修原因给予不同的植骨方式和选择适当的假体类型,可有效恢复髋关节周围骨量,重建髋关节的稳定性,改善髋关节的功能,近期随访疗效均满意。Objective: To study the treatment of vanous types of acetubular bone defect in revision of total hip replacement and early efficacy. Methods: 46 cases of acetabular bone defect after hip replacement were rerised and followed up.The acetabular prosthesis and bone changes were observed by X-ray, and the hip function was assessed by Harris score and VAS score. Results: 46 cases were followed up for 13~83 months(average 41.8months).The average Harris score from 53.15 ± 11.41 in creased to 91.23 ± 3.43 after revision(P 〈0.05);the VAS score from 7.8 ± 1.1 reduced to 1.2 ± 1.2(P 〈0.05). Conclusion: In total hip arthroplasty revision,using different grafting methods and choosing proper type of prostesis according to different causes,can effectively restore the hip bone,reconstruction of the stability of hip joint, and improve the function of the hip joint. Followup results are satisfactory.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3