预期违约制度与不安抗辩权制度比较研究  

A Comparative Study of Anticipated Breach and Counterargument Right for Security

作　　者：孙昊[1] 王琳[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学法学院,安徽合肥230601

出　　处：《黄山学院学报》2014年第4期25-27,共3页Journal of Huangshan University

摘　　要：民事行为,特别是合同行为是一个持续的过程,并非一蹴而就。法律在合同订立阶段设立了缔约过失责任;在履行阶段设立了违约责任,以此达到规制当事人行为、维护当事人合法权利的目的。但在合同生效后履行开始前如何维护各方的合法权利,预期违约和不安抗辩权这两种不同的制度应运而生。Civil actions, especially the actions of contract are continuous. To achieve the goal of regulating parties＇ behavior and protecting their legal rights, in the contract concluding stage, contracting negligent liability is established, and in the contract performing phase, liability for breach of contract is set up. However, before the performance of a contract, what can we do to protect the legal rights of all parties？ This is where the two systems of anticipatory breach and counterargument right for security came into being.

关 键 词：预期违约 不安抗辩 异同 评析 

分 类 号：DF418[政治法律—经济法学]