天使与魔鬼之辩:第三方开发广告过滤软件引发的法学思考  

Angels V.Demons Debate:Legal Consideration on Ads-skipping Software Developed by Third Party

作　　者：胡海容[1] 黄光辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆理工大学重庆知识产权学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2014年第10期23-29,共7页Intellectual Property

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"知识产权侵权惩罚性赔偿的国际比较研究"(项目编号:13CFX088);第二批重庆市高等学校青年骨干教师资助计划

摘　　要：第三方开发广告过滤软件引发的问题备受关注。从反不正当竞争法的角度分析,第三方开发广告过滤软件的行为并不构成不正当竞争。从著作权法的角度分析,在网络服务提供者的含有广告的网页构成汇编作品的情形,用户使用广告过滤软件可能侵犯汇编作品的完整权,广告过滤软件的开发者可能构成引诱侵权,浏览器运营者可能构成帮助侵权,但可以考虑适用类似"通知+移除"的规则。从第三人侵害债权的角度分析,广告过滤软件的开发者、用户、浏览器运营者可能构成第三人侵害债权。此外,还可以考虑通过立法的方式划定各方权利边界来实现各方利益新一轮的平衡。There is a widespread attention on the issue caused by ads-skipping sottware developed by third party. From the perspective of Anti-Unfair Competition Law, third party develops the ads-skipping software is not unfair competition. From the perspective of Copyright Law, if the web which contained advertisements of interact service providers is compilation works, users who installe the ads-skipping software may infringe the fight of integrity, software developers may be responsible for inducement infringement, explorer operators may be responsible for contributory infi＇ingement, which can be applied the similar rules like ＂Notice and Take down＂. From the perspective of third party infringement of creditor＇s fights, the developers, users and explorer operators may be responsible for third party infi-ingement of creditor＇s fights. In addition, in order to balance the interests among parties, it is advised to demarcate the boundary of rights through legislation.

关 键 词：广告过滤软件 不正当竞争 著作权侵权 第三人侵害债权 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学] D923[政治法律—法学]