检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河海大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2014年第3期84-89,93,共6页Journal of Hohai University:Philosophy and Social Sciences
基 金:司法部国家法治与法学理论研究重点项目(09SFB1006);中国法学会部级法学研究课题(CLS(2013)C54)
摘 要:精神障碍者的拒绝治疗权是弱者人权保障与自我决定权在《精神卫生法》中的贯彻,是精神卫生立法的核心问题之一。其兼具必要性和复杂性,因而在理论与实践中经常遭到曲解,如视精神科医生的医学判断为法律判决、将强制住院等同于拒绝治疗权的丧失、将限制拒绝治疗权适用的紧急情形扩大为一般性危险。由此导致对精神障碍者拒绝治疗权的否定和对人类尊严的蔑视,形成了贬低人格的家长主义。因此,学界需要对认识误区进行深度剖析并提出相应的对策,以期为完善我国的精神卫生立法提供建议。Mentally ill persons' rights of refusing treatment reflect the application of protecting human rights for the weak and rights for self-determination in Mental Health Act.It is the core issue of mental health legislation,which has both necessity and complexity. So misunderstanding is evitable in theory and practice. For instance,psychiatrists' medical verdict is regarded as legal judgment; involuntary admission is equal to the loss of rights of refusing treatment and emergency circumstances which limits the use of rights of refusing treatment is deemed to be the general danger.Such misunderstanding leads to the brutal denial of mentally ill persons' rights of refusing treatment and the extreme contempt of human dignity and then results in paternalism which degrades human personality. Therefore, it is necessary for academic circles to deeply analyze the above misunderstanding and propose corresponding countermeasures to provide suggestion for Chinese mental health legislation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68