对构建“轻罪”之法的省思  

Legal Reflection on Making a "Misdemeanor" Law

作　　者：刘红艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,武汉430072

出　　处：《北京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第5期36-41,共6页Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：我国立法定性又定量的模式总体来说利大于弊,模糊性是刑法的基本属性,"模糊"并不是由于刑法中的定量要素所致。定量要素的主要功能在于将没有达到"量"的一般违法行为予以出罪化。而通过取消刑法中的定量要素,构建"轻罪"之法,解决劳动教养制度废除后的遗留问题,并非是一种最合理、科学和经济的途径,在我国目前的法治背景下,只能带来实质的不明确以及司法的混乱和民众的茫然与不安。其与明确性原则所追求的价值目标以及以法治国精神所追求的价值意蕴相悖。In general, the advantages of the legislative model considering both qualitative and quantitative elements in our country outweighs the disadvantages. Ambiguity, as a basic attribute of criminal law, is not caused by quantitative elements, which hold the main function to exclude general illegal acts that did not meet the ＂ quantity＂ from crimes. Making a ＂ misdemeanor＂ law, through canceling quantitative elements in criminal law, will not become a reasonable, scientific and economic solution to the legacy issues after abolishing reeducation-through-labor, and conversely, will cause the substantive ambiguity, the judicial confusion and the public dazed and anxiety. Making a ＂ misdemeanor＂ law will be inconsistent with the principle of clarity in criminal legislation and the values of the rule of law.

关 键 词：轻罪 定量要素 立法模式 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]