“退货折旧费规制”之否定:消费者退货权保护的一种新路径探讨  

A Negation of the Regulations on Returns Depreciation:An Exploration into the Protection of Consumers' Right of Return

作　　者：韩乔亚[1] 

机构地区：[1]中央民族大学法学院,北京100081

出　　处：《安徽农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第5期82-87,共6页Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.

摘　　要：在司法实践中,"退货折旧费规制"存在着折旧率标准的确立缺乏合理性、内容缺乏科学性以及与我国相关法律立法宗旨相悖等问题。这主要是由于"退货权"本身的理念出现了偏差,致使消费者退货权的行使屡遭尴尬。由于让消费者在退货时支付折旧费的规定本身就缺乏其作为一项法律制度存在的基础,因此"退货折旧费规制"的规定不具有合理性和可行性,应当考虑将其从我国的法律、法规和规章中加以剔除。In judicial practices, there are some problems in ＂return the depreciation charge regulation＂, such as the lack of a fair established standard depreciation rate and a scientific content, and contradiction to the related laws. This is mainly due to the reason that there is deviation of the concept of ＂right of return＂, which leads to some problems in the practice of the right of consumers＇ return. The rule of letting consumers pay the depreciation is not reasonable and feasible because of lacking a law foundation itself, which should he deleted from the laws, regulations and rules.

关 键 词：退货权 退货折旧 权益保护 

分 类 号：F713.36[经济管理—产业经济]