检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘建国
出 处:《中国美容医学》2014年第16期1378-1381,共4页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:优选提高单纯性肥胖症疗效方案。方法:将100例患者随机分为穴位埋线联合药杖华佗夹脊穴组(治疗组)及毫针法单独体针操作组(对照组),每组各50例,并进行临床疗效对比观察。结果:两组分别于45天后比较疗效,治疗组总有效率(96.18%),与对照组(79.86%)相比具有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:穴位埋线联合药杖华佗夹脊穴治疗单纯性肥胖症总有效率优于单独体针操作,疗效稳定,不易反弹,且较针刺疗法方便,疗效持久。Objective To Improve the efficacy of simple obesity.Methods Totally 100 patients are randomly divided into two groups,one group is cured with catgut implantation at acupoint and the medicine stick Hua Tuo Jiaji Points (treatment group),and the other group is treated with Filiform needle method with single body acupuncture(reference group).Results two groups have significant difference (P〈0.01),the total effective rate of treatment group is 96.18,meantime,the reference group's total effective rate is 79.86% through comparing the clinical effects of two groups after 45 days.Conclusion The method of acupoint catgut embedding therapy combined with drug rod Hua Tuo Jiaji points for the treatment to simple obesity has better effect than the method of single acupuncture weight loss.the treatment effect of the first method is stable and rarely rebound.meatime,the acupuncture therapy is convenient and the effect is lasting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3