“故意抛出《文选》非昭明所撰之论”说辨证——读林大志先生《<文选>编者问题的重新思考》  

Discussion of the Theory that “The Selected Works Was Purposefully Declared not to Be Zhaoming's Work”

作　　者：力之[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西师范大学文学院,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《兰州大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第5期27-33,共7页Journal of Lanzhou University（Social Sciences）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金西部项目"<文选>成书考说"(10XZW010)

摘　　要：屈守元转述清水凯夫对其说的"大陆人只知道有昭明太子,竟不知昭明左吉有一大批人,因此他故意抛出《文选》非昭明所撰之论",不可当真,更不能未究其底里,便以此作为出发点来重新思考《文选》的编者问题。清水先生真实看法为:"《文选》的实质性撰录者不是昭明太子,而是刘孝绰。"清水先生在现代"选学"史上自有不容忽视的重要贡献,然其此说断不能成立。就当下言,《文选》"本就是萧统及其文士共同编纂这一基本判断"说,绕过了不同观点的相关研究。Mr. Qu Shou-yuan claimed that Shimizu Kaifu once told him that ＂mainland Chinese know PrinceZhaoming, but do not know that there was a large number of people around him; therefore, he purposefully declaredthat The Selected Works was not Zhaoming＇s work.＂ This is not true and cannot be further tracked down. WhatShimizu Kaifu really said was that ＂the real compiler of The Selected Works was not Prince Zhaoming; instead it wasLiu Xiaozhuo.＂ Although Shimizu Kaifu＇s achievement in the field of ＂Study of The Selected Works＂ can never beignored, this theory cannot be justified. For the time being, the theory that ＂The Selected Works was compiled byXiaotong and his literati＂ still holds water, unaffected by any other schools of thought.

关 键 词：《文选》 编者 昭明太子 清水凯夫 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]