检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘文化[1]
机构地区:[1]中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京海淀100088
出 处:《怀化学院学报》2014年第8期65-67,共3页Journal of Huaihua University
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"侦查取证行为规范化研究"(13YJA820015)
摘 要:充分保障侦查阶段律师辩护权是完善诉讼结构的需要,也是更好的保障犯罪嫌疑人各项权利的需要。2012年刑事诉讼法在保障侦查阶段律师辩护权方面取得了重大进步,但是仍存在一些不足,主要体现为侦查模式控辩双方不平等的结构性矛盾依然存在、律师会见权尚未得到彻底保障、律师调查取证权没有进步。由此,需要在思想观念上尊重辩护律师的主体地位、完善辩护律师的调查取证权、充分保障辩护律师的会见权,以确保侦查阶段律师辩护权的完整实现。Adequate protection of the right to counsel investigation stage is not only to improve the structure of litigation needs but also need better protection of the rights of criminal suspects . In 2012 , the criminal procedure law made significant progress in the protection of lawyers'defense right in investigation , but there are still some problems , of which inequalities between parties investigative mode still exist , lawyers'interview right has not yet been completely protected and lawyers'investigation and evidence collection right made no progress . The author holds that it is necessary to respect the dominant position of defense counsel on ideas , improve and perfect the investigation and evidence collection right and protect lawyers'interview right in order to ensure a full implementation of the right to counsel investigation stage .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30