检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省江门市新会区人民医院理疗科,广东江门529100 [2]广东省江门市新会区人民医院信息科,广东江门529100
出 处:《中国现代医生》2014年第29期140-142,共3页China Modern Doctor
摘 要:目的探讨红外线超短波治疗腹部切口感染的疗效。方法选择70例腹部切口感染患者,随机分为两组,应用抗感染、更换创面切口敷料方法相同。治疗组上午用红外线照射伤口,下午用大功率超短波治疗;对照组不采用物理治疗。两组待感染控制切口肉芽组织新鲜时予Ⅱ期清创缝合,治疗组继续理疗直至切口愈合。结果治疗组切口愈合天数为(15.26±5.14)d;对照组切口愈合天数为(21.74±5.35)d。两组比较具显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论红外线超短波治疗腹部切口感染能明显减少切口愈合的天数,疗效好且简单易行,降低医疗费用。Objective To investigate the efficacy of the infrared ultrashort wave treatment of abdominal incision in-fection. Methods Chose 70 cases of patients with abdominal incision infection, and they were divided into 2 groups randomly, which using systemic anti infection and dressing the same incision replacement. The treatment group used the infrared irradiation to the wound in the morning, while in the afternoon using ultrashort wave therapy with high power. The control group did not use physical therapy. Two groups treat infection control granulation tissue to II period when fresh debridement suture of incision, the treatment group continue to therapy until incision healing. Results Treatment group of incision healing days was (15.26±5.14) d; The control group incision healing days was (21.74±5.35)d. The two groups had significant difference (P〈0.01). Conclusion Infrared ultrashort wave treatment of abdominal incision infection can significantly reduce the incision healing of the number of days, curative effect is good and simple, which easy to reduce health care costs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28