检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]珠海市人民医院重症医学科,广东珠海519000 [2]南方医科大学珠江医院
出 处:《护理学杂志》2014年第19期8-10,共3页
基 金:广东省科技计划项目(2012B040301017)
摘 要:目的探讨远程护理干预对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者康复的影响。方法将符合纳入标准的83例COPD患者随机分为对照组42例和干预组41例,在患者出院后3个月内,对照组接受常规护理随诊,干预组在此基础上运用电话、QQ和邮件方式对患者实施远程护理干预。结果干预组患者出院后呼吸困难评分及症状严重程度评分显著低于对照组,3个月内再入院率显著低于对照组(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论对出院后COPD患者实施远程护理干预,可有效改善其病情与症状,效果优于常规方法。Objective To explore the effect of telecare service on recovery of COPD patients. Methods A total of 83 COPD patients were recruited and randomly divided into a control group of 42, who received routine nurse-led follow-ups, and an intervention group of 41, who received telecare service by using telephone, Tencent QQ, and E-mail. Results The scores of dyspnea and symp- tom severity, as well as the hospital readmission rate, were significantly lower in the intervention group than those in the control group (P〈0.05 ,P〈0.01). Conclusion Telecare service can lead to condition improvement and symptom relief in COPD patients, and it is superior to routine care.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3