基于交易与基于债务的货币本质观之比较  

A Comparative Study of the Nature of Money between the Barter-Based and Debt-Based Views

作　　者：李黎力[1] 张红梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学经济学院,北京100872

出　　处：《当代财经》2014年第10期57-66,共10页Contemporary Finance and Economics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"马克思主义;后凯恩斯学派和新熊彼特学派的经济危机理论及应用研究"(14BJL008);中国人民大学科学研究基金项目"农业价值链研究"(14XNH042)

摘　　要：关于货币的本质,在经济思想史上一直存在着两种针锋相对的观点:一种是主流经济学界所持有的"基于交易"的货币本质观;另一种则是非主流经济学界所秉持的"基于债务"的货币本质观。这两种截然对立的货币本质观导致对货币的起源和演进、职能、作用以及货币经济的性质和政策含义等范畴存在截然不同的理解,并表现在方法论层面的分野和锁定。同主流的货币本质观相比,非主流的"基于债务"的货币本质观往往更加契合历史事实和人类记录,并对现代货币生产型经济的解读更为深刻,但却囿于自身的方法论歧见而长期备受忽视和边缘化。货币兼具商品和债务双重属性的可能性,为这两种迥乎不同的货币本质观之间的有机综合提供了前景。In the history of economic thoughts, there have been two diametrically opposed view- points about the nature of money： one is the ＂barter-based＂ view held by the mainstream eco- nomics, the other is the ＂debt-based＂ view held by the non-mainstream economists. These two dia- metrically-opposed views lead to distinct understandings of various monetary categories, such as the o- rigin, evolution, function, roles of money, as well as the nature and policy implications of monetary economy, etc.. This is also reflected by the division and locking on the methodological level. Com- pared with the mainstream view, the non-mainstream debt-based view tends to conform bettor to the historical facts and human records, and casts more light upon modem monetary productive economy. However, confined by its methodological differences, this view has been neglected and marginalized for a long time. Money with the possibility of having the dual attributes, both as the goods and the debt, can provide a good prospect for the organic integration of these two different views.

关 键 词：货币的本质 基于交易 基于债务 双重属性 

分 类 号：F820[经济管理—财政学]