检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]蚌埠医学院第一附属医院肿瘤内科,安徽蚌埠233004
出 处:《蚌埠医学院学报》2014年第9期1299-1301,共3页Journal of Bengbu Medical College
摘 要:目的:探讨应用精密过滤输液器减少抗肿瘤辅助用药所致的输液反应和静脉炎的效果。方法:将306例静脉输注抗肿瘤辅助用药的恶性肿瘤患者随机分为观察组150例和对照组156例。观察组使用一次性精密过滤输液器输液,对照组使用一次性普通输液器输液。比较2组患者输液过程中输液反应和静脉炎的发生情况。结果:观察组与对照组输液反应的总发生率分别为6.7%和21.1%,静脉炎的总发生率分别为7.3%和26.9%。观察组输液反应和静脉炎的发生率均显著低于对照组(P〈0.05~P〈0.01);观察组静脉炎的程度较对照组明显减轻(P〈0.01)。结论:使用精密过滤输液器能有效减少抗肿瘤辅助用药所致输液反应和静脉炎的发生。Objective:To investigate the effect of precise filtering infusion in reducing the infusion reaction and phlebitis induced by anti-cancer adjuvant drugs. Methods:A total of 306 cancer patients receiving intravenous infusion of anti-cancer adjuvant drugs were randomly divided into observation group ( 150 cases ) and control group ( 156 cases ) . The patients in the observation group used disposable precise filtering infusion apparatus and the patients in the control group ordinary syringe injection. The incidence of infusion reaction and phlebitis in the two groups was observed and compared. Results:The total incidence of infusion reaction was 6. 7% and 21. 1% in the observation group and the control group,respectively;the total incidence of phlebitis was 7. 3% and 26. 9% in the observation group and the control group, respectively. The incidence of infusion reaction and phlebitis in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(P〈0. 05 to P〈0. 01);the phlebitis in the observation group was relieved significantly (P〈0. 01). Conclusions:Application of precise filtering infusion apparatus can effectively reduce the occurrence of infusion reaction and phlebitis induced by intravenous injection of anti-cancer adjuvant drugs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.0.35