检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何佳起 李敬[1] 李颖[2] 王荣霞[2] 孔繁托 王维展[1]
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学附属哈励逊国际和平医院EICU,河北衡水053000 [2]河北省衡水市第二人民医院,河北衡水053000
出 处:《医学临床研究》2014年第8期1492-1494,共3页Journal of Clinical Research
基 金:河北省衡水市2012科研基金(12019A)资助课题项目
摘 要:【目的】探讨和肽素、急性生理学及慢性健康状况评估Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)在评估急性百草枯中毒(acute pa-raquat poisoning ,APP)预后的临床价值。【方法】选择126例APP患者,以住院期间临床死亡作为观察终点,分为存活组58例和死亡组68例。所有入选者在入院后2 h、24 h、7 d内抽取静脉血3 mL ,检测和肽素水平,同时连续记录APACHEⅡ评分的数据。【结果】死亡组服毒剂量显著大于存活组,而抢救时间、首次灌流时间和灌流次数之间无显著性差异( P>0.05)。入院后2 h和肽素水平,死亡组显著高于存活组( P<0.05)。而APACHEⅡ评分两组间无显著差异( P>0.05)。入院后24 h存活组和肽素降至正常,死亡组水平仍显著高于存活组( P<0.05),APACHEⅡ评分两组无差异( P>0.05)。入院后7 d死亡组和肽素水平持续不降,而APACHEⅡ评分水平明显升高,两组差异有明显统计学意义(P<0.05)。APP患者口服农药剂量与和肽素、APACHEⅡ评分呈正相关。【结论】连续检测Copeptin及APACHEⅡ评分对APP患者预后的评估及合理分配医疗资源有重要临床意义。[Objective]To explore clinical value of Copeptin ,acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (APACHE II) in the evaluation of the prognosis of acute paraquat poisoning (APP) .[Methods]Totally 126 patients with APP were selected .When clinical death during hospital stay was taken as the endpoint ,all patients were divided into survival group( n =58) and death group( n=68) .Venous blood 3ml of all patients was drawn at 2h ,24h and 7d after admission .The level of Copeptin was detected .APACHE Ⅱ score was also continuously recorded .[Results] The poisoning dose in death group was significantly greater than that in survival group ,while there was no significant difference in rescue time ,first time of hemoperfusion and perfusion frequency ( P〉0 .05) . The level of Copeptin in death group at 2h after admission was significantly higher than that in survival group ( P〈0 .05) ,while there was no significant difference in APACHE Ⅱ score between two groups ( P 〉0 .05) .The level of Copeptin in survival group at 24h after admission was decreased to the normal ,but that in death group was still significantly higher than that in survival group ( P 〈 0 .05) ,and there was no significant difference in APACHE Ⅱ score between two groups( P〉0 .05) .The level of Copeptin in death group at 7d after admission was continuously decreased ,but APACHE Ⅱ score was increased obviously ,and there was significant difference between two groups( P 〈0 .05) .Oral dose of pesticides in patients with APP was positively correlated with Copeptin and APACHE Ⅱ score .[Conclusion]Continuous measurement of Copeptin and APACHEⅡ score has important clinical significant in the evaluation of the prognosis of patients with APP and reasonable distribution of medical resources .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.144.87.133