解构历史书写的一种尝试——以钱穆“士人政府”为例  

An Attempt to Deconstruct Historical Writing:Chien Mu ‘Literati Government'as an Example

作　　者：张耕华[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学历史学系,上海200062

出　　处：《史学史研究》2014年第3期60-66,共7页Journal of Historiography

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"吕思勉史学研究"(项目编号:12BZS003)阶段性成果

摘　　要：《秦汉史》和《国史大纲》是钱穆的两部重要史著,但两书对西汉政制的解读全然不同。解构两书不同的历史书写,尤其是对比其对史料、史事的选择、解读的差异,可以考察钱氏治史风格的变化,也有助于理解历史书写的本质特征。Chien Mu wrote two important historical works： one is QINGHANSHI, the other is GUOSHIDAGANG. There is different understanding of the political system of the Western Han Dynasty in the two books. It is necessary for us to deconstruct the two different historical works, especially to distinguish the differences in choosing, organizing and interpreting historical facts. Through the investigation of this kind we can identify his various historiographical styles. The investigation can also help us understand the nature of historical writing.

关 键 词：钱穆 士人政府 历史书写 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]